{"id":41,"date":"2006-02-23T14:49:38","date_gmt":"2006-02-23T19:49:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/?p=41"},"modified":"2006-02-23T14:49:38","modified_gmt":"2006-02-23T19:49:38","slug":"nun-profits-and-affluent-lines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/?p=41","title":{"rendered":"Nun-profits and affluent lines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Several of us thought we were hearing things \u00e2\u20ac\u201d which we were \u00e2\u20ac\u201d when there came an exchange between a teacher and principal. It went something like this:<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0&#8220;Do you mean the class can&#8217;t keep the money irregardless of how hard each one worked? To which the principal answered, &#8220;Yes, irregardless.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Without getting technical, I need to emphasize that the use of &#8220;irregardless&#8221; prompts the question, &#8220;as opposed to what?&#8221; If we&#8217;re going to use that coined term, then what does plain old &#8220;regardless&#8221; mean?<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Try recasting the sentence and inserting &#8220;regardless&#8221; where its bulkier, more awkward counterpart appears. Doesn&#8217;t &#8220;regardless&#8221; suffice, does the new prefix negate the negation, giving it a meaning of &#8220;not regardless&#8221;? And might people be thinking of different terms, like &#8220;irrespective&#8221; and &#8220;irregular&#8221;?<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Attending all of the recent Optic-sponsored city council\/mayoral forums lately has made many of us aware of some interesting coinages of words. On the one hand, there are many charter members of the &#8220;What Does It Matter, As Long As We Understand It?&#8221; school. They have a point. But for the rest of us, who have worked so hard to maintain the last vestiges of the language, it Does Matter.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0At a recent forum, Leith Johnson passed me a list of words she&#8217;d caught at various forums (or, as my English teacher would say, various &#8220;fora&#8221;). One of the words, one we&#8217;ve heard more frequently in times of drought, is &#8220;zeroscaping,&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;xeriscaping.&#8221; The &#8220;x&#8221; in xeriscaping sounds like a &#8220;z.&#8221;<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0The x-word refers to a spartan scheme that conserves water by limiting the planting of grass and other greenery. But in this case, &#8220;zeroscaping&#8221; says it better. The city says no watering, and that means zero.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Another term, also water-related, refers to &#8220;effluent,&#8221; which sounds like &#8220;affluent.&#8221; But there are shades of difference. Now &#8220;effluent&#8221; refers to an outflow from a sewer or sewage system, currently a big concern for voters ready to march to the polls in March.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0But &#8220;affluent&#8221; gives it a more uptown connotation. Sewer water is what people in my neighborhood put up with. But &#8220;affluent&#8221; is what flows out of sewer lines in more opulent neighborhoods, the silk-stocking districts. But just be careful where you step with those stockings.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0During the forum for municipal judge, we heard about how &#8220;court costs help to defer&#8221; certain expenses. The speaker didn&#8217;t mean &#8220;defray&#8221;? We thought so, but after further review, changed our minds. To defray is to help pay expenses. Selling brownies helps defray the costs of the scouts&#8217; field trip. To &#8220;defer&#8221; is to submit to the wishes or decisions of another, or to put off, to postpone, as in sentencing.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0A judge, weary of a endless procession of scofflaws, all deserving jail time, may not wish to assess court costs all at once. Better to defer them.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Judee Williams was taking notes when we heard one of the council candidates declare, &#8220;I am not anyone\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s political pond.&#8221; Our first impulse may have been to correct the speaker: &#8220;Don&#8217;t you mean political pawn?&#8221; but that more likely was a carefully chosen combination which seems appropriate.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Here&#8217;s why: A pawn, whose most common reason for being relates to a chess game, refers to something dispensable and easily manipulated, a candidate whose purpose is solely to defray to more effluent manipulators.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0But &#8220;pond&#8221; has considerable merit. In addition to the concerns that Storrie Lake will soon become Storrie Pond, we hear people using the term &#8220;pond scum&#8221; and &#8216;bottom feeder.&#8221; Now these are sobriquets people would wish to avoid. And we trust this candidate will never allow himself to be identified with anything having to do with ponds.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0At Tuesday&#8217;s forum a speaker referred to a charitable organization as a nun-profit organization. Now that description was perfect. Though it&#8217;s rare to use the words &#8220;nun&#8221; and &#8220;profit&#8221; in the same sentence, this usage helps explain the few coins people like Mother Teresa would be able to glean to help the poor. &#8220;Nun-profit,&#8221; in this context, is ideal, and habit-forming. If Miriam, Deborah and Judith of Biblical times had been running such an organization, would that have been a nun-prophet group?<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Once, my dean at Highlands said, &#8220;We have about 20 nun-readers.&#8221; And he said it as if that were a problem. The convents in Las Vegas had closed years earlier, and nun-students were scarce. My only nun-student, a Sister Castigata Fortissimo, was an excellent reader.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Alfonso Ortiz, himself a former city councilor, current county treasurer and former education professor at Highlands University, stopped by the Optic last week to comment on my recent column about a culvert in my childhood &#8216;hood. He used the term &#8220;chivo.&#8221; That word is one of many about which I am uncertain. My dad called me &#8220;chivo&#8221; after I locked the keys in the family car and also when I won a spelling bee at school.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Is the term one of praise or derision? I looked it up in three English\/ Spanish dictionaries. One of them, a Webster&#8217;s Wal-Mart edition that sells for 97 cents, doesn&#8217;t list any words beginning with ch.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0A second dictionary places all the &#8220;ch&#8221; words between the &#8220;c&#8221; and &#8220;d&#8221; entries. And the third, wisely, places &#8220;ch&#8221; within the &#8220;c&#8221; section, where it belongs. The Spanish alphabet, in many dictionaries, by the way, no longer treats &#8220;ch&#8221; as a separate letter.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0The definition it provides for &#8220;chivo&#8217; is goat or kid. Was Ortiz kidding, trying to get my goat? Now, another word I&#8217;ve been called (it&#8217;s the first Spanish word non-Spanish speakers learn when they arrive here), also means a big goat or big kid.<br \/>\n\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0But that&#8217;s a subject for another column.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Several of us thought we were hearing things \u00e2\u20ac\u201d which we were \u00e2\u20ac\u201d when there came an exchange between a teacher and principal. It went something like this: \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0&#8220;Do you mean the class can&#8217;t keep the money irregardless of how hard each one worked? To which the principal answered, &#8220;Yes, irregardless.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rezio.net\/woa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}